Online Exclusives

Setting, Technique, and Technology: Drivers of Orthopedic Design in 2026

Innovation now happens at the intersection of clinical insight, data science, and manufacturing—a dynamic that will define design in the coming year.

Author Image

By: Bryan Monroe

Senior Vice President, Global Research & Development, Surgical Division, at Enovis

Photo: jimmy/stock.adobe.com.

Orthopedic surgery is at an inflection point. Procedures once confined to hospitals are now being performed in outpatient centers. Techniques are becoming more refined and less invasive. Technology is expanding from assistive to enabling. The convergence of these trends is driving a new generation of orthopedic innovation defined by personalization, precision, and practicality.

As more surgeons in ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) balance their dual roles as clinicians and business owners, research and development teams are reimagining product design to fit smaller, more efficient environments, while simultaneously advancing the next generation of enabling technology and surgical techniques.

These shifts are occurring against the backdrop of larger changes in healthcare. Value-based care models continue to prioritize quality and cost-effectiveness. Patients want faster recovery and less invasive procedures. And the maturity of digital tools is enabling a level of personalization that was not possible even five years ago.

For R&D leaders, this means the design process itself must evolve. Innovation now happens at the intersection of clinical insight, data science, and manufacturing—a dynamic that will define orthopedic design in 2026 and beyond.

The Shift to Outpatient & ASCs Is Driving Innovation

The migration of total joint replacement procedures into outpatient and ASC environments continues to accelerate. For many surgeons, this shift has expanded their roles, not only as clinical experts but also as decision-makers balancing efficiency, cost, and patient outcomes. These changing dynamics are prompting R&D teams to rethink how technology can serve the realities of these smaller, faster-paced environments.

Outpatient settings demand solutions that are compact, efficient, and intuitive. Traditional systems developed for large hospitals may not fit the space, capital, or workflow models of an ASC. As a result, the design mindset across the industry is evolving toward minimized instrument sets, smaller footprints, and integrated functions.

The goal is to deliver hospital-grade performance with ASC-friendly efficiency without compromising precision or safety. The innovation challenge is no longer limited to what happens in the operating room; it now extends to how equipment is transported, sterilized, and set up.

For orthopedic developers, this presents an opportunity to translate complex technology into accessible, adaptable systems that can meet surgeons wherever they practice.

At the same time, surgical approaches in hip and knee arthroplasty are changing rapidly, influencing the next generation of device design.

In hip replacement, there’s a growing adoption of the direct anterior approach, which allows for muscle-sparing and faster recovery times. This evolution has guided new design priorities, including instruments that fit smaller incisions, implants optimized for anterior exposure, and tools that support reproducibility. The continued shift toward collared stems and mechanized impactors, which reduce manual force and lower the risk of femoral fracture, reflects the drive to both improve consistency and reduce surgeon fatigue.

Knee arthroplasty is also undergoing a philosophical shift, with more surgeons exploring kinematic alignment methods to restore a patient’s natural joint motion rather than enforcing a uniform mechanical axis. This shift toward patient-specific kinematics is driving demand for tools and technologies that deliver precise, repeatable alignment, such as navigation platforms, surgical arms, and augmented reality systems.

These evolving surgical preferences also underscore the importance of collaboration between R&D and clinicians. The most effective design teams work hand-in-hand with surgeons from concept through validation, translating subtle clinical insights into mechanical solutions. For instance, iterative testing with surgeon partners can reveal ergonomic adjustments that improve visualization in the anterior approach, or fine-tune impactor feedback to balance force with control. This partnership-driven approach accelerates learning and ensures new systems align with real-world surgical needs rather than theoretical ideals.

As surgical philosophies evolve, orthopedic design must evolve with them. Future systems will need to accommodate multiple alignment methods and workflow preferences, offering flexibility without complexity. The key will be tools and implants that integrate seamlessly into a range of techniques while maintaining consistency and precision.

Personalization Is the Future of Orthopedics

One of the most notable changes in orthopedic innovation is the way technology is inverting the traditional design process. Historically, implants came first, and technologies were created to help surgeons place them more accurately. Increasingly, that relationship is reversing, and technology is shaping the design process from the start.

Advances in digital planning, intraoperative navigation, and data analytics are providing engineers with unprecedented visibility into real-world performance. The feedback generated from thousands of procedures is guiding iterative improvements and inspiring new possibilities for implant geometry, fixation, and materials.

This evolution extends to how bone is prepared for the implant. Current techniques rely heavily on manual, mechanical processes, but emerging methods such as robotic arms, laser preparation, and computer-guided milling promise more precision and greater flexibility. These capabilities could eventually free implant designers from the geometric constraints of traditional instrumentation, opening the door to new fixation strategies and more individualized implant shapes.

When combined with additive manufacturing, these advancements bring the industry closer to true personalization. If bone can be prepared to fit any design and implants can be 3D-printed to match it, orthopedic care can move beyond standardized systems to patient-specific solutions with the ultimate goal of better outcomes.

Digital integration will continue to expand this potential. As planning software, navigation technology, and post-operative digital platforms become more connected, they will provide a continuous stream of insight into surgical performance. Over time, this data-driven feedback loop will equip surgeons to enhance precision, efficiency, and predictability while keeping final decisions in their hands.

A Future Defined by Convergence

Looking ahead, innovation in orthopedics will likely move toward greater connectivity between devices, digital platforms, and people. The next frontier will be interoperable ecosystems that bring together preoperative imaging, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative outcomes into a single feedback network. These systems will enable faster iteration, more precise personalization, and stronger evidence generation to support future advancements.

As these forces continue to converge, the focus of orthopedic design will expand beyond hardware toward holistic solutions that improve every stage of the surgical journey. The industry’s challenge, and its opportunity, lies in transforming convergence into meaningful progress for both surgeons and patients.


Bryan Monroe is the senior vice president of global R&D for Enovis Surgical, leading teams developing the latest in orthopedic implant designs and enabling technology solutions, and has helped develop a rapid cadence of innovation at the company. He has almost 35 years of orthopedic industry experience and over 29 years at Enovis (formerly Encore Orthopedics and DJO Surgical). In his tenure at Enovis, he has held multiple leadership roles in the areas of marketing, sales, international business and research & development, and has been involved in the development and launch of over 100 product families. Monroe holds BSE and MS degrees in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Iowa.

Keep Up With Our Content. Subscribe To Orthopedic Design & Technology Newsletters